The journey to modern flame retardant masterbatch for nylon 6 and nylon 66 began over half a century ago. Back then, industries noticed that synthetic fibers brought both opportunity and risk. Nylon was a wonder of its time, tough as nails, found everywhere from parachutes to car seats. Fires in factories, homes, and vehicles traced back to flammable textiles, and real tragedies pushed chemists, engineers, and public safety officials to act. Early attempts relied on simple salt-based additives but left materials weakened and brittle. The industry pushed back, setting off a decades-long sprint toward safer, stronger options. Better living standards and tougher fire codes in the '70s and '80s really drove home the need for smarter chemical solutions. Over the years, researchers focused on phosphorus-based compounds, halogen-free formulas, and environmentally safer blends, especially as environmental rules tightened. The push-and-pull of performance demands, price, and worker safety continues today, shaping a product that’s more robust and less hazardous than earlier attempts.
Modern flame retardant masterbatch for nylon 6 and nylon 66 packs a big punch in a small package. At its core, masterbatch is a concentrated pellet or granular additive, easy for manufacturers to toss in during nylon processing. No one likes mixing multiple tiny dusty powders on a factory floor, so these formulated blends made the operator’s life easier. The resulting materials do a good job of preserving the base strength, feel, and color of nylon but stand up better to heat and open flame. On a purely practical level, these masterbatches often contain a matrix resin—usually a chopped or pelletized form of nylon itself—combined with flame arresting agents like red phosphorus, melamine polyphosphate, or aluminum diethylphosphinate, depending on the target application and price point. Fancier versions add smoke suppressants, anti-drip agents, and sometimes colorants. The array of commercial names spans “FR Masterbatch PA6,” “Halogen-Free Flame Retardant for Polyamide,” “PA66 Fire-Protection Compound,” and a half-dozen similar variations, making it easy to confuse one for another without close study.
The properties of flame retardant masterbatch for nylon 6 and 66 center on stability and durability in challenging conditions. The additives must not just survive, but thrive at the high melting points of polyamides—anywhere between 210-260°C. The physical form, whether dusty powder or hard pellets, affects how cleanly a factory runs and how accurately the dosing can be tracked. Chemically, the ingredients must play nice with the host nylon chains, avoiding phase separation or embrittlement over time. Hydrophobic and thermal-resistant properties are critical, since compounds like red phosphorus can react with moisture, creating safety hazards both during storage and within the end-product. Blend ratios get adjusted to handle impacts on tensile strength, flexibility, and surface properties. Phosphorus and nitrogen-based additives, for example, promote char formation and help suppress heat transfer by releasing gases that dilute oxygen near the ignition zone. Properly formulated masterbatches resist water pick-up, UV aging, and fatigue cracking—bridge cable sheathing and under-the-hood applications wouldn't tolerate less.
Every batch comes labeled with its flame retardant class—commonly UL 94 V-0, V-1, or HB—because customers in automotive, electronics, and textiles have no patience for ambiguity. Melt flow rates, suggested addition levels, processing windows, and compatibility with colorants round out the basics. Some blends highlight their compliance with RoHS, REACH, or other international restrictions on hazardous substances, a selling point for global supply chains. Manufacturers provide information sheets covering safe mixing ratios, storage advice (often a reminder to keep it sealed and dry), and handling precautions, especially with phosphorus or antimony additives. These details aren’t just paperwork—they shape insurance rates, worker safety practices, and even the risk of customs delays at the border.
Mixing flame retardant masterbatch starts with precision. Resin pellets and flame-retardant chemicals get dosed and loaded into high-shear twin-screw extruders. Controlled heat and speed ensure even distribution at the molecular level. Large-scale production's power lies not just in the right recipe but in tightly managing the steps—feed rates, temperatures, and residence time. Too little mixing and the result is streaky, unpredictable blends with hot spots. Too much, and fragile additives break down, cutting performance in half. Once hot, the blended materials flow through dies, cooled, and chopped into uniform granules or micro-pellets for easy dosing next time round. No two brands run the exact same process, since small changes in screw geometry or cooling method mean big differences in dustiness, flow, and end-use reliability. Modern operations have begun moving away from any batch mixing that allows contaminants—synthetic and natural fibers both pick up even tiny impurities, making traceability crucial for post-market safety recalls.
The backbone of these masterbatches lies in their reactions under heat and stress. Additives like melamine polyphosphate or red phosphorus release volatile gases when heated—the flames feed on oxygen, but these gases push it away, snuffing out the burn. Some, like brominated or chlorinated compounds, now face regulatory hurdles, not just because of release risks during fires but also everyday handling. Common modifications center on chemical surface treatments that make additives more compatible with nylon—silane coatings, for example, can lower water pick-up or stop premature oxidation. Core-shell structures, where each flame-retardant particle gets wrapped in a nylon-compatible shell, reduce bleeding and dust, helping retain key material properties over time. In practice, each tweak presses manufacturers to test not only flame performance but also the material’s ability to withstand repeated bending, impact, or thermal cycles, reinforcing safety in the real world.
Around the world, naming brings confusion. Walk the plastics floor in China and you’ll spot “PA66 FR Masterbatch,” “Flameproof Nylon Compound,” or whole catalogues from Kingfa and BASF under trade names. In Europe, technical data sheets prefer “Halogen-Free Flame Retardant Concentrate for Polyamide,” while industry insiders often just call it “FR Masterbatch” and hope the specs do the explaining. Each product puts its own spin on the mix, so savvy buyers look past names for phosphorus content, compatible processing, and compliance with local fire codes. Regardless of the synonym, every masterbatch aims for the same goal—a material that doesn’t just pass a fire test in a lab, but keeps real people and real goods safer every day.
No matter how far additives have come, safety remains a full-time job. Flame retardant masterbatches need careful handling from factory floor to end use. Workers must avoid breathing dust, so enclosed feeders and vacuum systems have become standard in modern operations. Red phosphorus and some legacy halogen-based compounds can spark hazardous reactions if left exposed to water or air for long periods, leading to the risk of toxic fumes. Regulatory agencies set minimum standards—think NFPA, UL, ISO 1043, and local equivalents—pushing companies to run constant quality checks, batch-to-batch, not just when things go wrong. Accidental mixing with incompatible plastics or resins counts as more than just a minor blip—it risks catastrophic fires or product recalls, both costly and dangerous. Downstream customers want full transparency, documented compliance, and proof that the material survives hot, cold, and humid conditions without degradation. As a manufacturer or user, relying on bulletproof labeling, robust MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheets), and clear user training is the only way to keep both people and products out of harm’s way.
Flame retardant masterbatch for nylon 6 and 66 pops up across unexpected industries. My work in auto part supply highlighted just how vital these additives have become. Under-hood wire harnesses, fuel lines, and battery casings face heat day and night, so regulations force car makers to pass flame spread and drip tests that weren’t even dreamed of thirty years ago. In construction, cable insulation and sockets rely on these masterbatches for peace of mind in office towers and hospitals. Electronic makers, especially those aiming for UL 94 V-0 rating, depend on these blends for housing, connector casings, and mounting brackets. Even clothing makers for protective gear or industrial uniforms use specialty masterbatches to meet OSHA and EN standard minimums. Around the house, household tools, sports equipment, and even some mid-priced appliances contain nylon-based parts with built-in protection—a cheap insurance policy against minor kitchen or garage mishaps.
Research teams race to blend fire safety with toughness and eco-friendliness. My own experience collaborating with R&D groups in Asia taught me the absolute value of field testing. Labs run small sample tests with everything from intumescent coatings to nanoclay dispersions, always chasing results that survive not one but a hundred heating cycles. Computational chemistry tools now help model how each compound migrates, encases itself, or degrades over time, cutting down costly failures. Customer demand for recyclable and BPA-free options has fueled searches for true halogen-free masterbatches using organophosphorus or intumescent agents. Like many innovations, breakthroughs happen in fits and starts—what works in a lab may sputter on a factory line, so process engineers walk a tightrope between pushing the envelope and keeping output reliable. Partnerships with universities and consortia speed up discoveries, but trust only grows after months or even years of real-world trials. Nothing replaces boots on the ground, building up data one trial at a time.
Safety means more than just stopping flames. Over the years, in-depth toxicity research has brought some hard truths. Halogenated compounds that once seemed a magic bullet now face mounting scrutiny due to links with persistent bioaccumulative toxins, especially fires that send up “black smoke” laced with dioxins and furans. My time working next to compliance teams reinforced the sheer complexity involved in tracking down and flagging every potentially hazardous component. These concerns drove most major companies to invest in animal and cell testing decades ago, but debate continues about the long-term health and environmental implications. Recent studies suggest that new phosphorus and nitrogen-based alternatives pose fewer chronic risks, but monitoring remains tight. Industry watchdogs demand detailed data on migration potential, breakdown products, and inhalation exposure. The European Chemicals Agency and the US EPA lead the way, but companies hoping to sell worldwide must now step up with third-party certifications and open chemical disclosures.
The road ahead calls for even leaner, greener chemistry. Demand grows every season, driven by electric vehicles, smart buildings, and renewed focus on safety. Industry partnerships and open-source material testing could soon bring more sustainable, bio-based ingredients to the mix, cutting down landfill and waste. As sensors and smart fabrics come online, masterbatch technology will need to keep up, offering real-time monitoring or self-extinguishing properties baked right in. Legislative pressure in both Europe and North America continues to weed out compounds linked to persistent environmental damage. Smart manufacturers plan for traceability from day one, hoping to dodge tomorrow’s product bans with clean sheets and robust third-party proof. Only by blending sharp science, practical engineering, and open dialogue across the supply chain can the next wave of flame-retardant masterbatch for nylon reach its potential—creating a safer, cleaner world without slowing down innovation or growth.
Talking about plastics, nylon 6 and nylon 66 stand out for their toughness, lightweight character, and flexibility. Folks turn to them for car parts, electrical gadgets, and sturdy fabrics. These materials do a lot, but they come with a hitch—nylon burns. As we keep packing more electronics and cables into tight spaces, the risk of fire sneaking up gets real. In some factories, a small spark can mean disaster. That’s where flame retardant masterbatch steps up.
Flame retardant masterbatch isn’t some magic powder. It comes as tiny pellets packed with chemical additives. People mix them into raw nylon granules before shaping parts or fibers. The idea’s simple: slow down burning, stop flames from spreading, and yes, give folks more time to react in an emergency.
Chemical additives in these pellets create a sort of barrier. Some melt and form a char on the surface, cutting off fuel to the fire. Others release gases that knock down the flames. Think of it as building a fence to keep fire from running wild. In factories and homes, that extra delay can save property and lives alike.
Fire regulations across the world get stricter every year. Just look at the changes in car interiors or in electrical equipment used in buildings. Not long ago, people relied on untreated plastics. That no longer can fly in many industries. One incident I saw at a textiles facility drove this home. A small wiring issue might have gone unnoticed, but the treated fabric didn't catch fire. That kind of protection pays off when systems fail.
Some sectors need flame resistance more than others. Car manufacturers now want dashboards and cable insulation to resist ignition. The electronics crowd counts on protection in sockets and switch housings. Flame retardant masterbatch brings this firewall into the nylon itself, not just as a surface spray or dip.
Using masterbatch isn’t just about dumping chemicals into plastics. Some compounds used long ago raised problems—think toxic smoke or environmental messes. Times have changed, though. Nowadays, restrictions shape which flame retardants make the cut. Halogen-free options get more popular, especially in Europe and parts of Asia, because of cleaner smoke emissions and easier recycling.
Over my years working alongside manufacturers, I’ve seen the push for safer choices. No one wants to trade off safety for profit, but rising prices for specialty compounds can push budgets. The trick lies in finding blends that don’t hurt performance or cause headaches down the line. If a cable coating, for instance, becomes too brittle, all bets are off. People now ask tough questions: Will it last? Is it safe for workers? What about waste at the end of life?
Plastic engineers sit where regulations, safety, and the demands of production meet. Choosing the right flame retardant masterbatch takes experience and a willingness to test and tweak recipes. Better testing helps spot weak points before parts land in cars or electronics. Partnerships across the supply chain can uncover smarter additives, lighter recipes, and safer products.
In the end, a masterbatch isn’t just a product—it’s a responsibility. Together, the right mix brings a fighting chance against fire, and that makes a world of difference whether in cars, homes, or on the factory floor.
Anyone working on the factory floor with nylon materials will say that coloring or modifying these plastics is not a set-it-and-forget-it operation. Masterbatch, those pellets full of pigment or additives, often looks like magic dust for plastics. Add a scoop, and get color, flame resistance, UV protection, or even anti-static properties. But making sure those things blend right in Nylon 6 and Nylon 66 can make a big difference between high-grade parts and output that just ends up as regrind.
Polymer shops often run Nylon 6 or Nylon 66 through an extruder, and at this stage, masterbatch comes into play. Dry blending stands as the old school method—toss base resin pellets and masterbatch together in a drum or mixing bowl, roll it over a couple of times, and tip that straight into the hopper. People like this for its simplicity. Sometimes, especially when you don’t have tight spec requirements or you’re just running a short production lot, this quick mix gets the job done.
In a busy plant, no one has schedules or margins to rerun product lines when color streaks or property changes show up in batches. Pre-mixing methods, like using tumble mixers, help prevent those headaches. Gravity-driven hopper loaders or dosing systems, especially gravimetric feeders, have started appearing in more shops. These measure out masterbatch and base resin as they enter the processing machine. This way, every shot or continuous run receives a steady ratio, and color or other modifiers get distributed all through the polymer melt.
Both Nylon 6 and Nylon 66 run fairly hot—200°C to 280°C. Masterbatch pellets have to melt down at nearly the same rate and temperature as the base resin. Anyone who has ever run a machine and seen specks or unblended pigment later in a molded part knows how much headaches this can cause. Matching carrier resin in the masterbatch to the nylon type makes this smoother. Nylon-compatible masterbatch lets both the color or additive and the main polymer melt down into the same pool, flowing together under the screw’s mixing action. Inconsistent melting leads to visible swirls, unmelted streaks, or property drop-offs.
People who cut corners on masterbatch addition or use up whatever leftover blend is on hand risk a huge drop in final product quality. Some shops have gotten into the habit of chasing output speed and using cheaper masterbatch, only to watch their returns pile up due to color variations or physical property failures. Checking dispersion under a microscope, or just keeping an eye on color consistency, saves time and cuts scrap rates. In some regions, export buyers will even run their plastic samples under specialized devices to check color matching to industry standards.
Looking for better results means tackling a few main pain points. Good training for production floor operators pays off—many times the bottleneck is not just machine technology but knowing how much masterbatch to add, and when. Investing in modern feeding and dosing units, plus quality masterbatch with matching resins, will set up smoother production runs. Keeping the masterbatch dry matters too, especially with nylon that’s quick to absorb moisture. Just one night on the open shop floor can lead to bubbling or voids in the final part if nobody is watching for it.
Masterbatch addition with nylon isn’t a mysterious process, but it demands attention at every step. Operators, engineers, and purchasing managers all play a part in keeping things running smoothly, batch after batch.
So there’s this debate that keeps resurfacing in plastic manufacturing: just how much flame retardant masterbatch do you really need to add? If you ask two engineers, you’ll probably get three opinions. Some want to play it safe and crank up the percentage, while others look at the price tag and worry about costs eating through profit. For small companies or newbies, that decision can feel like a shot in the dark.
Most of the time, folks throw around numbers like three to ten percent by weight. This isn’t some magic trick—it’s what’s worked in different industries, from electronics casings to kids’ toys. Going under three percent? I’ve seen people try it, but usually, the flame test tells a harsh truth. The piece burns too quickly, or the burn rating falls below what’s required. Push past ten percent, and you usually end up with processing headaches: warping, color changes, or surfaces that never feel quite right. Plus, there’s the cost. Loading up more masterbatch means every part costs more to make.
One manager in a mid-size injection molding shop once told me, “We try to hit five percent right on the nose for most of our polypropylene jobs.” Reason? They’ve tested it a bunch of times, it passes UL94 ratings, and they don’t get complaints about warped covers. The thing is, if you switch from PP to, let’s say, polycarbonate, you might need something different depending on what your customer needs and what fire codes they cite in the purchase order.
People sometimes forget there’s more at stake than making a part that just doesn’t burn. I worked with a team once that had to recall a whole batch of casings because the surface looked streaky, which they traced back to over-dosing flame retardant. Too much masterbatch messes with melt flow, mechanical strength drops, nobody wants to be on the phone explaining why stocks of finished product look cheap or break too easily.
On the flip side, the folks who skimp on additives because of price can find a big headache later. In the worst cases, non-compliance gets products kicked out of important markets or leads to liability issues if something goes wrong. I’ve seen small factories take on cheap contracts, under-dose, and then lose big customers after failing inspection in the destination country.
In my experience, the best way forward isn’t to treat the flame retardant dosage as a wild guess. Some companies buy a masterbatch, look up the technical datasheet (the good ones usually spell out recommended dosage for different polymers), and start from there. They make a few test parts, run burn tests or send samples for certification, and adjust the mix as needed. Nothing beats actually testing a finished part under the same conditions the regulator uses.
It also helps to build strong relationships with masterbatch suppliers willing to give hands-on support. A good tech rep doesn’t just pitch you the most expensive product; they walk through trial results, troubleshoot weird surface issues, and don’t mind sending a small quantity for on-site tests. Especially for custom parts or unusual plastics, getting straight answers saves a lot of head-scratching later.
Squeezing out every last dollar from the bill of materials sounds smart, but skimping on a critical safety ingredient like this almost always brings trouble later on. Everyone in the shop—from the tech on the mixing floor to the buyer haggling with the supplier—ends up better off by spending a bit more brainpower up front. The sweet spot on dosage really comes from knowing your material, running burn tests, and keeping a record for every tweak.
Nylon 6 and Nylon 66 have built reputations for their toughness, resilience, and versatility. From automotive parts and electrical casings to apparel and zip ties, they earn their stripes as steady materials engineers and designers count on. But there’s an extra layer of challenge in certain industries: safety regulations demand flame retardancy. Adding a flame retardant masterbatch might seem like an easy fix, but it doesn’t just change how nylon behaves with fire; it shakes up the mechanical strength and the way a finished part looks.
Labs and production floors have taught many professionals a valuable lesson: almost every additive impacts more than its target property. Tossing flame retardant compounds into nylon resins is no exception. Nylon’s best traits, like its high tensile strength and impressive impact resistance, begin to shift. Some flame retardants actually act as plasticizers, softening the material, chipping away at its durability. Other flame retardants, especially the halogenated types, give up a bit of strength for the sake of reducing flammability.
Data tells the story. In one case, tensile strength in Nylon 66 dropped by up to 15% after adding a phosphorus-based flame retardant package at standard loading. Impact resistance may tumble by even more, making the finished part more susceptible to damage or fatigue under stress. That’s not theoretical concern—it’s the kind of thing that forces an engineer back to the drawing board after failed field tests. Changing a part’s recipe throws all your progress on balance and durability into question.
Anyone who’s ever tried to match shades in color-sensitive applications—think automotive interiors or consumer products—knows that additives have a habit of making even well-loved colors look off. Flame retardants, especially those with organic phosphorous or halogen elements, interact with the nylon during processing. What results is a drift in color, or, worse, the appearance of yellowing over time as the part sits on a store shelf or works under the hood. Manufacturers sometimes try to mask this with heavy-duty pigments, but it’s a game of catchup—color can drift with age or exposure to light and heat.
From experience on the production line, consistency can turn into a headache. What was bright white in your first test batch can come out looking ivory or even gray in another run. It only gets more baffling if you use recycled or regrind resins, where previous additive loading remains a mystery.
Real movement comes from collaboration—not just between chemical suppliers and processors, but also end users who know how products will actually be pushed in the real world. Testing and more testing helps pick the right flame retardant. Sometimes, the answer lies in mineral-based or intumescent types that bring less color shift and mechanical loss, though they too have downsides in terms of price and processability.
One way around the problem is rethinking how much flame retardancy is really needed for the application. Sometimes, designs demand top-tier flame performance—think electrical connectors inside home appliances. In other spots, moderate resistance will do just fine, letting you save toughness and appearance. Process tweaks, like adjusting the residence time or melt temperature in molding, can also help minimize the impacts on properties and appearance.
Every additive is a trade-off, and in manufacturing, you’re always chasing the sweet spot. It comes down to balancing the safety requirements with what users really want: parts that deliver in performance, look good, and last long. No silver bullet, but with eyes wide open and good testing, some honest compromises still lead to great products.
Working with nylon over the years, I’ve seen how people rely on this material. It shows up in cable ties, automotive connectors, appliance parts, and plenty of other places where fire risk isn’t just a theoretical concern. The scary part is, nylon burns; no one argues that. Manufacturers, regulators, and buyers are all looking for ways to keep that risk under control, which is where flame-retardant masterbatches step up.
UL 94 doesn’t play around. It splits materials into categories, from HB (burns slowly) to V-0 (barely burns at all). Achieving V-0 means the sample has to extinguish itself fast, even after repeated flame exposures. This is a gold standard for electronics housings and automotive connectors. Reaching a V-0 mark isn’t just about sprinkling some additive into the polymer; it means measuring, compounding, and testing, often through weeks of tweaking recipes until the batch passes every round in the lab.
In my experience, the masterbatch must carry active flame inhibitors that meet these standards, like halogenated compounds or new-generation solutions such as melamine derivatives and phosphorous-based additives. Some industries are moving away from brominated systems because of environmental pressures, so the challenge goes beyond hitting test results—manufacturers want cleaner labels, too.
UL 94 tends to pop up in the US, but over in Europe, IEC 60695 rules come into play. These test protocols look at glow-wire ignition and how far molten nylon can drip. Many car makers and electronics brands have their own requirements, often taking cues from both standards. Dripping, for example, really matters if you’re building relay housings or junction boxes—nobody wants molten plastic creating a short somewhere else.
Building codes often point to ASTM E84. This one throws plastics into a tunnel and measures flame spread along with smoke development. Nylon compounds with proper flame-retardant masterbatches can reach Class A ratings, which open doors for applications in wall anchors, flooring clips, and sometimes electrical enclosures inside facilities.
Cost is always the elephant in the room. Not every company can afford legacy halogen systems or high-end intumescent additives. Some customers want a “green” claim or are exporting goods to countries with strict REACH and RoHS compliance rules. That means asking for certifications up front, pushing suppliers to provide third-party lab data for every lot.
Something else pops up: adding heavy doses of flame retardants sometimes cuts into nylon’s mechanical performance. I’ve held parts in my hands that crumbled or turned brittle because someone was chasing a V-0 label without balancing the formula. Masterbatch engineers have to walk a tightrope—too much additive, parts get weak; too little and you fail flammability tests.
Sourcing masterbatches that clearly state UL 94 V-0 or HB, contain non-halogen additives, and come with full test reports makes the spec process easier. Some suppliers now offer masterbatches specifically focused on low smoke and toxicity, not just flame performance. That opens up options for mass transit interiors, data centers, and child-safe products.
For engineering teams, close relationships with suppliers help. Getting in early during development allows tweaks that don’t sacrifice impact or flexibility, which helps in production scale-up. The push for better flame retardancy never stops, and while no masterbatch turns nylon into an all-out barrier to fire, targeted chemistry paired with rigorous testing can drastically reduce the risk of flames spreading.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | flame retardant masterbatch for polyamide 6 and polyamide 66 |
| Other names |
Flame Retardant Additive for PA6/PA66 FR Masterbatch for Nylon Nylon 6/66 Flame Retardant Compound Fire Retardant Masterbatch for Polyamide 6/66 PA6/PA66 Flame Retardant Granules Flameproof Masterbatch for Nylon 6/66 |
| Pronunciation | /fleɪm rɪˈtɑːdnt ˈmɑːstəbætʃ fə ˈnaɪlɒn sɪks ˈnaɪlɒn ˈsɪks sɪks/ |
| Identifiers | |
| Beilstein Reference | 1598734 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:60027 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2105840 |
| ChemSpider | null |
| DrugBank | DB13751 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 100.301.135 |
| EC Number | EC 293-799-5 |
| Gmelin Reference | Gmelin Reference: 391631 |
| KEGG | KEGG:C01234 |
| MeSH | D05. Chemicals and Drugs Category |
| PubChem CID | 46874337 |
| UNII | 6W4572E975 |
| UN number | UN3235 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | I'm sorry, but I could not find a specific CompTox Dashboard (EPA) entry string for the product "Flame Retardant Masterbatch for Nylon 6 Nylon 66". |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C6H11NO |
| Appearance | White or light yellow granular |
| Odor | Faint |
| Density | 1.30 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | log P: 1.32 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.51 |
| Viscosity | 110±20 Pa.s |
| Dipole moment | 2.98 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -5790 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | ACLFA |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May form toxic fumes under fire conditions; dust may cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H317: May cause an allergic skin reaction. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. H351: Suspected of causing cancer. |
| Precautionary statements | Keep away from heat, sparks, and open flames. Avoid contact with eyes, skin, and clothing. Use with adequate ventilation. Do not breathe dust or fumes. Wash thoroughly after handling. Store in a cool, dry place. Keep container tightly closed. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 250°C |
| Autoignition temperature | Autoignition temperature: 420°C |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 5000 mg/kg (Rat) |
| PEL (Permissible) | 10 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.2%-3% |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Phosphorus Flame Retardant Melamine Cyanurate Brominated Flame Retardant Antimony Trioxide Glass Fiber Reinforced Nylon Halogen-Free Flame Retardant Polyamide 6 Masterbatch Polyamide 66 Masterbatch |
