Flame retardants have traveled a winding road over the years. Early versions packed more promise than real safety, often creating as many problems as they meant to solve. Even back in the 1970s, industry folks realized that many halogen-based compounds, while doing their job of slowing fires, were also quietly adding toxins to our homes and landfills. The birth of non-halogenated solutions signaled a turn in thinking. Exolit OP1230 entered the scene in the past two decades, part of a genuine shift toward smarter chemistry. In my days consulting for plastics manufacturers, concerns over hazardous residues were all too real — every choice might mean safer furniture in schools or fewer contaminants seeping into the ground. Manufacturers, regulators, and consumers found themselves tangled in the legacy of older flame retardants, craving solutions that could balance performance with responsibility. This hunger for better outcomes set the stage for innovations like Exolit OP1230.
Exolit OP1230 didn’t show up by accident. Developed for a new generation of plastics and coatings, it answered calls for less toxic, halogen-free protection. Most technical folks will recognize it as an ammonium polyphosphate fine-tuned for greater thermal stability. The product isn’t just another powder to toss into a mix. Factories using Exolit OP1230 reach for it because it stays steady at higher processing temperatures—a feature not always seen in regular alternatives. I’ve watched teams complain about older additives breaking down too soon or fouling up equipment. This one offers a break from those headaches and plugs right into established workflows, whether you’re molding plastics, mixing paints, or engineering textiles that need another layer of confidence against flames. Its reliability makes a real difference across the board, from wire insulation to auto interiors.
This compound sets itself apart thanks to both its structure and performance. Standing out with a white, solid granular form, Exolit OP1230 supports easier handling compared to sticky or messy liquid agents. Its decomposition temperature pushes above 300°C, which means fewer worries about unexpected breakdowns during high-heat manufacturing. I’ve seen plant operators sigh in relief at that stability, especially after wrestling with additives that degrade during extrusion or molding. The solubility sits on the lower end; it won’t readily dissolve in cold water, so its fire-blocking barrier holds up longer. That keeps it right where people need it—in the surface layer when a fire starts, not sinking into deeper layers and disappearing. Exolit OP1230’s pH leans toward the neutral to slight alkaline range, so equipment corrosion doesn’t become a routine maintenance headache. These details sound technical, but in practice, they save time, money, and a lot of frustration for people running the machines.
Every shipment moves with tight technical sheets and standardized labeling. Buyers find phosphorus content listed at around 30 weight percent and decomposition temperatures noted clearly, often right on the drum. Accuracy here matters. Missed specs can mean application failures, and I recall more than one project stalled when a supplier quietly adjusted their formula without updating the paperwork. Manufacturers and downstream users lean on this transparency because mislabeling means risk—not just of failed performance, but liabilities and rework nobody wants. Packaging includes tamper-evident seals, batch numbers for recall purposes, and clear hazard statements so workers know what they’re dealing with. This structure reflects a commitment to traceability, the backbone for modern supply chains trying to juggle speed and safety.
Exolit OP1230 typically emerges from a well-honed reaction between phosphoric acids and ammonia under carefully controlled conditions. The key is slow, controlled polymerization, avoiding impurities and ensuring particle uniformity. In my experience, consistent batch quality hinges on tight controls at this stage. Fast-tracking these reactions almost always leads to uneven material — a sure way to bring on customer complaints and rejected lots. The end product is then dried, milled to specific particle sizes, and screened multiple times because industrial users need material that feeds smoothly into their lines. Ceremonial as it might sound, quality checks at each step aren’t an optional luxury; even one misstep shows up later down the line as clogs in extruders or uneven coating thicknesses. The best producers don’t cut corners, and it’s obvious when those habits flow through to the shop floor.
Exolit OP1230 isn’t just static powder. Its phosphate chains kick off protective charring reactions during a fire. Once it hits high temperatures, the compound releases phosphoric acid, helping to form a sturdy carbon-rich foamed residue. I’ve seen examples during burn tests where this layer physically blocks oxygen and heat from feeding the flames, keeping damage limited to the outermost skin. Companies often blend Exolit OP1230 with other synergists, such as melamine derivatives, to push performance even higher. Modifications sometimes adjust molecular weight, creating bespoke versions for different plastic resins or even for textiles and coatings. The market now asks for specialized versions to match tougher processing temperatures or stricter fire ratings. R&D efforts often tweak chain lengths to balance cost, easy blending, and final fire resistance. The chemistry gives manufacturers room to maneuver, adapting to stricter regulations or ambitious new product lines.
The chemical trade can make things confusing with its batch of product names. Exolit OP1230 also appears under ammonium polyphosphate, APP II, or sometimes as specialty APP blends. Competitors offer their variants—often marketed with brand coloring rather than genuine differences. If you’re digging through safety data sheets, expect to see CAS number 68333-79-9 which helps cut through the confusion. This alphabet soup of branding can frustrate anyone tracing ingredient history or responding to regulatory questions. My own files run thick with notes cross-referencing similar-sounding products, since accuracy here decides compliance, not just cost.
Modern flame retardants like Exolit OP1230 come bundled with much tighter safety playbooks than a decade ago. Workers need real protection—dust controls, gloves, proper ventilation—because nobody wants to repeat past mistakes where simple handling became a health hazard. Gone are the days where additives arrived with little more than a shrug and a folded instruction sheet. International and local regulations, including REACH and RoHS, set sharp limits on toxicity and environmental impact. Most suppliers now settle only for grades that pass both toxicological and environmental leaching tests. Regular audits, standardized storage requirements, and emergency protocols run as non-negotiable features in any facility using this product. These standards feel burdensome at times but pay off, especially when regulators or clients show up with clipboards, ready to dig into the details of chemical handling and safety logs.
Industries working with Exolit OP1230 range from construction to automotive and electronics. I’ve seen its biggest impact in rigid polyurethane foams, piping insulation, and circuit board housings. Building codes now demand ever-tighter fire safety standards, so architects lean harder on plastics filled with flame retardants. Electrical engineers tag it for cables and switch casings, breathing easier knowing the material won’t feed a fire in a short circuit. Automotive makers coat under-hood components and door panels, limiting fire spread without driving up costs or adding heavy metals. Consumer pressure keeps pushing suppliers to replace outdated materials in mattresses, upholstery, and even public transport seat fabrics. As more people become aware of fire safety and indoor air quality, the pressure grows on makers to upgrade their flame barriers.
Current R&D in the flame retardant space doesn’t just chase performance improvements. Teams split their efforts across environmental impact, recyclability, and reducing any tradeoffs in mechanical properties of end products. Labs measure not only how Exolit OP1230 performs in a flame test but also how it breaks down after years of use or recycling. I’ve attended more than one conference where the discussion quickly shifts from pure chemistry to lifecycle analysis—because what ends up in landfill matters as much as what keeps a house safe in a fire. Researchers explore new synergistic blends, tossing in stabilizers or plasticizers to stretch applications further. These efforts reflect a market demanding more than just fire safety, weighing health, circularity, and long-term compliance. Funding now favors initiatives promising lower footprint and better safety for both people and planet.
Much of the earlier skepticism about flame retardants grew from ugly surprises—bioaccumulation, hormone disruption, and persistent residues. Exolit OP1230 gets marked for its lower acute toxicity compared to halogenated additives. Toxicology panels show that it leaks less into surrounding environments, an edge for water treatment facilities or recycling plants. Air and dust monitoring studies in facilities using this product show reduced levels of problem contaminants compared to older fire protectors. That said, questions don’t disappear. Chronic exposure, breakdown byproducts, and rare handling accidents keep researchers alert. The safest outcome results from constant vigilance—updated exposure limits, regular health checks, and honest reporting of long-term effects. The march toward greener chemistry is ongoing, and nobody should pretend the work is done yet. Teams in Europe and North America, backed by growing legislation elsewhere, keep adding to the body of evidence, sometimes catching trace effects before they become new scandals.
With climate shifts driving harsher fire seasons and insurance companies raising red flags, demand for effective flame retardants keeps accelerating. Exolit OP1230 sits at the crossroads of needed performance and growing scrutiny. I expect that future versions will push further into biobased chemistry, driven as much by regulation as consumer preference. Additive producers will have to juggle tighter costs with mounting reporting requirements. The uphill climb continues—balancing safety, supply chain resilience, and compliance with ever-stricter standards. As designers and engineers demand materials that tick more boxes—durable, safe, green—flame retardants like Exolit OP1230 will keep evolving, tested at every turn by both markets and regulators. The next breakthroughs should bring answers to tougher questions: not only stopping flames, but keeping environments, workers, and end users safe for decades to come.
Exolit OP1230 is a flame retardant, but not the scary chemical kind you might recall from the past. Phosphorus-based and halogen-free, this product offers manufacturers a new way to meet fire safety rules without running into legacy problems tied to older flame retardants. As a consumer, I’ve noticed the rising attention around toxins, especially with what we put in our homes. The industry has shifted too, spurred by both health and environmental concerns.
The older halogen-based flame retardants, once used in everything from sofas to plastics, have faced bans and scrutiny. Long-term exposure has led to tough public debate, especially as research linked these chemicals to hormone disruption and environmental buildup. Unlike those, Exolit OP1230 avoids chlorine and bromine, which means far less impact on air and water quality when products reach the end of their lives.
Manufacturers want materials that won’t burn easily, but no one likes trading safety for health. Because Exolit OP1230’s core is ammonium polyphosphate, it fights fire by creating a protective layer of char, slowing down flames and smoke. I've seen parents scan product labels, hunting for clues they’re not bringing dangerous substances home.
This product ends up in a surprising range of items. Furniture makers mix it into upholstery foams, builders add it to insulation boards, and electronics manufacturers use it to treat casings and cables. I noticed its impact in construction firsthand. Builders now look for flame retardants like this one to boost fire resistance in insulation boards—crucial for both safety codes and green building certifications.
Polyurethane and thermoset plastics in cars benefit just as much. I once spent a stint working at an automotive supplier, where fire codes for interior materials get stricter each year. The pressure comes not only from regulators but also insurance companies and consumers demanding safer designs. Exolit OP1230 shows up in dashboards, door panels, and sometimes even seat structures. Reduced smoke means better survival chances in a crash or fire.
Shifting to new flame retardants isn’t as seamless as we'd like. Costs rise, and engineers lose some of the convenient properties found with halogen-based options. I’ve heard stories of product failures during early phases, from poor plastic molding to unexpected color changes. But investment keeps pouring in as regulations toughen worldwide. In Europe and China, tight rules fueled early adoption, and now US-based manufacturers join the trend.
One real worry is “regrettable substitutions”—swapping out one bad chemical for another without full safety tests. Exolit OP1230 has cleared more toxicity studies than many rivals, but even now, watchdog groups call for ongoing review. No company wants tomorrow’s headlines pointing fingers at another overlooked hazard.
To make these products better for everyone, transparency matters. Labels could tell families or builders which chemicals live inside everyday gear, helping buyers pick safer options. Investment in long-term research keeps the pressure on manufacturers to step up. That way, we get better fire safety and peace of mind, without playing catch-up for decades to come.
Fire safety hits close to home for a lot of us, whether we’re thinking about what lines our couches, the casing of our washing machines, or the plastic shells of the tools in our garages. Flameless plastics buy us time in an emergency, and Exolit OP1230 offers a solid example of science stepping up when things get hot.
This is a phosphorus-based flame retardant that’s been getting plenty of use in polyolefin compounds, things like polypropylene and polyethylene. Unlike old-school halogenated flame retardants, it skips out on the mess of toxic smoke or corrosive byproducts. Nobody wants a safety feature that brings its own problems—especially in cars or electronics where folks spend a good chunk of their lives.
Manufacturers look for additives that don’t mess with the appearance or strength of their finished products. Here, Exolit OP1230 lands right in the sweet spot. The fine, white powder blends into mixtures without leaving a mark, so plastic parts hold on to their bright colors and don’t crumble under pressure. The job it does shows up in the data: with a decomposition temperature north of 360°C, it won’t bail out during the usual melt processing. I’ve seen plenty of materials in shops scorch or yellow too early in the process, but that’s not the case here.
Getting more specific, Exolit OP1230 belongs to the ammonium polyphosphate family. It’s got a very high phosphorus share—close to 31% by weight. The average polymerization degree often reaches above 1,000, which keeps water solubility low. The less something leaches out under heat and humidity, the longer it sticks around in the final product. I’d wager that’s why cable sheathing manufacturers and folks in injection-molded parts gravitate toward it.
Let’s talk particle size. The stuff’s average size usually stays under 15 microns. Keeping particles small makes it easier to mix evenly throughout a batch, so you don’t get random clumps or weak spots later. That’s not just a theoretical improvement; personal experience with stubborn clumping in older flame retardants shows how frustrating uneven mixing can be in extrusion or compounding lines.
There’s a steady push to keep hazardous materials away from homes, offices, and factories. Exolit OP1230 plays into that by dodging bromine and chlorine. It’s classified as non-hazardous by most global standards, and it doesn’t give off nasty gases if things do catch fire. Regulations get tighter every year, so picking an additive with clean credentials doesn’t just future-proof manufacturing—it sends a message to buyers that their safety matters.
The push to recycle plastics—especially in automotive and electronics—puts extra pressure on material choices. Folks working on closed-loop recycling see fewer problems with Exolit OP1230, because it doesn’t tank mechanical properties after a run or two. Traditional flame retardants, in contrast, sometimes knot up supply chains with incompatible waste or residue.
More companies ask for materials that balance performance, safety, and sustainability. Exolit OP1230 covers a lot of those bases, but that doesn’t mean the conversation ends there. Some folks in processing want even better dispersibility or compatibility with wild new polymers. Chemistry teams are tweaking the formula, sometimes by treating the powder with surface coatings to help with melt flow. I’d like to see more partnerships between additive makers and recyclers to make sure new blends won’t gum up existing reprocessing tech.
Whenever a material gets labeled as “halogen-free,” it attracts attention fast. Exolit OP1230 falls into this club, skipping elements like chlorine or bromine that cause problems during fires and long after products reach a landfill. This claim sits front and center in marketing sheets and product specs. Having spent time in the manufacturing world and around plastics recycling plants, I know how much pressure there is to find safer alternatives for flame retardancy. So it’s easy to see the appeal when Exolit OP1230 avoids the old halogenated formulas. No need to worry about dioxins or corrosive smoke here.
Here’s the catch: just because something avoids halogens, that doesn’t automatically give it a green halo. The core ingredient in Exolit OP1230 is an organophosphorus compound. The production of phosphorus-based flame retardants guzzles mined phosphate rocks, and the mining process can disrupt ecosystems, taint water, and pump out greenhouse gases. That’s the reality behind the raw materials, no marketing-spin required.
When items treated with Exolit OP1230 end up as waste, recyclers don’t have to worry about halogen-related toxins, which felt like a relief for me the first time we ran cables and plastics with this additive through the shredders. But phosphorus compounds can cause different issues if recycling streams aren’t set up to handle them, including challenges for compostability or breaking down safely in landfills. Testing batches in real-world scenarios beats any lab report.
Halogenated flame retardants built a reputation for long-lasting toxicity, building up in food chains and showing up in national health surveys. In contrast, phosphorus-based products generally don’t linger in the body the same way. Worker safety improves, and neighborhoods around recycling facilities breathe easier. During fires, smoke from Exolit OP1230-treated materials carries fewer of the dangerous gases linked to traditional compounds. The switch matters for firefighters and anyone who lives near places that handle these materials daily.
It’s tempting to paint Exolit OP1230 as entirely eco-friendly, especially compared to what it replaces. In the factory, it doesn’t need special venting or high-tech scrubbers to keep the air clean for workers. Product designers tell me it offers flame resistance at lower doses, which means less additive overall and less chemical ending up in circulation. Still, mining for phosphorus doesn’t vanish as a concern.
If the goal involves safer products from start-to-finish, industry and regulators need better transparency about how these chemicals interact with air, soil, and water. Tracking these impacts kicks off in the lab, but any credible solution must involve testing across a product’s whole life cycle. Having talked to product compliance teams, I found out that standardized toxicity and biodegradation data still aren’t where they need to be. Bluntly speaking, green claims should tie back to independent audits, not marketing wishful thinking.
Getting the verdict on “environmentally friendly” means looking beyond a simple checkmark for being halogen-free. Cleaner air and safer working conditions matter, no doubt. But the job doesn’t end there. Real improvements call for tracking phosphorus sourcing, closing recycling loops, and updating regulatory frameworks. I’ve seen what’s possible when companies share data and governments fund practical pilot programs. If Exolit OP1230 wants to wear the green label honestly, its makers and users need to open up about the total impact, not just its biggest selling points.
If you've worked with flame retardants in the past, most likely the rules feel strict, but they exist for good reason. Exolit OP1230 packs the punch that modern manufacturing demands, but it’s still a chemical—one that doesn’t cut folks any slack if basic care goes out the window. My years knocking around production floors remind me that treat a chemical right from day one, and half the trouble never shows up in the first place.
I’ve watched how Exolit OP1230 reacts to careless storage—a ripped bag left open, or drums jammed up in a leaky warehouse corner. The stuff cakes up fast when it draws in moisture. Don’t give it the chance. Keep every bag sealed tight and pick a dry, cool spot. Pallets off the floor, nothing stacked too close to walls, and leave enough air flow to stop temperature swings inside the storage room. Workers sometimes forget, but temperature can ruin flame retardants just as surely as water can. Temperatures above 40°C? Leave them for the curing ovens, not your storeroom.
Common sense matters here. I remember a summer when we ran a dehumidifier nonstop—humidity hovered near 75%, and by the end of the month, our materials held up just fine compared to the neighbor’s lumpy stockpile. Investing in sealed containers and checking for leaks pays off every time. A dry, steady environment saves money and headaches down the line.
A lot of folks see a powder and forget that even the safest materials come with real risk if you ignore basic gear. Exolit OP1230 spreads fine dust into the air when poured or transferred. Without goggles or a mask, it’s only a matter of time before someone starts to cough. Sweaty hands and open skin don’t go well with this chemical either. Long-sleeved clothing, gloves, a dust mask, and safety goggles should form the standard operating uniform in any workspace that opens a bag or drum.
I’ve seen operations where nobody kept a spill kit nearby. One slip or torn bag, and the cleanup crew scrambles. Keep absorbent materials and dedicated bins at arm’s reach. Sweep gently instead of blasting dust into the air, and avoid using compressed air. It only takes a bit of powder drifting where it shouldn’t to cause longer-term cleanup problems. Wash exposed skin right away and don’t wait until someone starts itching.
Clear labeling cuts down on accidents. Mark every container sharply, and update storage logs each day. Bring new staff up to speed with short, to-the-point training—few things stop problems like a team that knows the ropes instinctively. It’s easy to grow complacent over time, but a five-minute refresher every few weeks keeps everyone sharp. I’ve found staff step up when they realize the company takes their safety seriously—post instructions, double-check inventory, and treat handling as part of the job, not a chore to rush through.
Exolit OP1230 stands as an industry staple for a reason, but familiarity breeds trouble if people lose respect for its quirks. Stay on top of storage, remember simple gear, and keep procedures clear. Don’t let shortcuts sneak their way into daily routines, and not only do you avoid costly waste, you keep your team out of the doctor’s office. Simple rules, applied every day—nothing fancy, just steady, safe work.
Exolit OP1230 comes up often for flame retardancy, especially in tough situations where classic halogen options just don’t fit the bill anymore. Folks working with PP (polypropylene) and engineering thermoplastics run into it because regulations have tightened and expectations for product safety keep going up. Owners and process engineers want a clear roadmap that works on the shop floor, not just guidance mixed with technical jargon. Mistakes get costly fast: agglomeration, inadequate dispersion, lower mechanical values—they can all snowball if someone skips the basics.
I remember stepping into a factory line years ago and seeing an operator struggle with dosing Exolit OP1230 in a twin-screw extruder. Processing advice from technical data sheets only went so far. Humidity in the storage room crept over 60%, and the additive clumped before even hitting the feeder. First pointer: always keep this additive dry. Store it below 30°C and stick with humidity below 50%. Some teams forget that opening a bag for five minutes in a cold or wet environment can already change how this powder behaves in the blend.
Any phosphorus-based flame retardant, including Exolit OP1230, pulls in water that sticks around during processing. Added moisture will lead off-gassing and foaming in your finished parts. Shop teams need a dehumidifying dryer, preferably a vacuum option, and should aim for a moisture content below 0.05% before moving to extrusion or injection. Good blending happens only if pellets or powder aren’t sticky or clumpy. Sometimes, a gentle tumble mixer can sort this out as long as the mixing doesn’t generate much friction or heat.
Let’s talk barrels and screws. Twin-screw extruders offer the best shot for a homogenous compound, especially at filler rates north of 20%. Screw configurations that give moderate shear (not too aggressive but not a lazy turn either) help avoid degrading the base polymer—nobody wants charred trails. I always check for pressure jumps near the die head, a sign something’s not moving right. Operators notice torque increases or vibration spikes first, so gauges and data logging save time.
Keep zone temperatures between 190°C and 230°C—lower at the feed throat, rising toward the metering zone. Over 240°C, there’s a risk of breaking down Exolit OP1230, and that brings both odor and color shift to finished parts. The base polymer might handle more, but the additive won’t.
The biggest headaches on the line start with poor dispersion. Good additive manufacturers treat Exolit OP1230 with surface treatments, but I’ve still needed to adjust feeders often, keep an eye on vibratory loss-in-weight systems, or switch to high-intensity side feeders. Blending time matters; too short, and pockets form; too long, and you risk dragging in too much air.
Downstream, cooling must happen quickly. Don’t let extrudate cool slowly or with random air drafts—go for a water bath or calibrated chill rolls. That’s how you stop warping and internal stresses from ruining everything just before pellets drop into bags.
People sometimes think once the blend looks fine, the job’s over. But pulling out test samples, checking mechanical strength, and burning samples to monitor phosphorus content means you catch problems before shipping boxes out the door. Regular cleaning of feeders and screws keeps line stops rare.
If lines keep jamming or agglomerates show up in finished products, it usually comes down to moisture or poor feeding. A few simple changes—better dryers, gentler blending, real-time monitoring—go a long way. The truth is, no one likes rework. Most headaches disappear by respecting the additive’s need for dry, steady input and a little patience during blending.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Phosphinic acid, aluminum salt (3:1) |
| Other names |
OP 1230 Exolit OP 1230 |
| Pronunciation | /ɪɡˈzoʊlɪt oʊ pi wʌn ˈtwɛl(v) θɜrˈti/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 1227857-18-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 104798-46-9 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:31343 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL4290571 |
| ChemSpider | 30841070 |
| DrugBank | DB11369 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03afb5c2-ee1e-47a6-aa31-cb98941eb827 |
| EC Number | 01-2119486772-26-0000 |
| Gmelin Reference | 394570 |
| KEGG | C18607 |
| MeSH | Dichlorophenylphosphine Oxide |
| PubChem CID | 11479613 |
| RTECS number | WX7525000 |
| UNII | YD4N729073 |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | (C8H18O7P2)n |
| Molar mass | 1300 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to slightly yellowish powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.4–1.5 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 1.7 |
| Vapor pressure | < 0.01 hPa (20 °C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 13.1 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 11.6 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -10E-6 cm³/g |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.54 |
| Viscosity | Viscosity: < 1000 mPa·s (23 °C) |
| Dipole moment | 0.5 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 1.6 J/(mol·K) |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1974 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -17.3 MJ/kg |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | N09AX12 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS08 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H317, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P280, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
| Flash point | > 220 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 410 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): > 300 - 2,000 mg/kg bw |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 2000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | WI0403000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for Exolit OP1230: "10 mg/m³ (inhalable fraction), 3 mg/m³ (respirable fraction) |
| REL (Recommended) | 2,5 |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Exolit OP1240 Exolit OP1312 Exolit OP930 Exolit OP1400 |
