Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 didn’t appear out of nowhere. Chemical engineers and material scientists spent years tracking the burning behavior of new polymers. Through trials and errors, the need for better flame retardants grew especially intense in the late twentieth century. Computers, home appliances, and automotive industries all called for safer plastics that didn’t simply melt or ignite. Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 answers a safety call that sparked in factories and in the aftermath of untold small fires. As hazard testing got stricter, large companies funneled serious cash into stabilizing plastics. Researchers, often after long nights at the lab, started combining decabromodiphenyl ethane with polyethylene carriers. It’s only by sharing stories with industry veterans that you realize how long the journey took from the drawing board to drum barrels shipped across the world.
Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 steps up as a halogenated flame retardant masterbatch. The main gig goes to decabromodiphenyl ethane, which sits strongly at roughly 90% by weight, piggybacking on polyethylene’s recognizable structure. Not all plastics need heavy-duty protection, but in wiring insulation, electronics enclosures, and transport infrastructure, DBDE-PE90 fills a role where burning isn’t an option. Over time, producers streamlined pellet shapes and standardized particle distribution, letting engineers pour bags into mixing hoppers without fuss. The consistency came after plenty of frustration, listening to complaints, and retooling machines to squash clumps and flakes. Only after industry trade shows settled on accepted performance grades did MB DBDE-PE90 start earning trust for reliable batch-to-batch results.
The main property users notice lies in bulk density and fine granule flow. Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 feels solid in a handful, not dusty, with a melting point above 100°C, thanks to its high ethane bromide content. The formulation’s orange tint suggests a robust flame-retarding backbone, perfect for coloring blends in cables or molded parts that still want predictable shade. Chemically, it laughs in the face of most acids and bases, showing little sign of breakdown even after soaking for days—critical in corrosive environments. In a production setting, that reliability becomes essential for operators who can’t afford process shutdowns for batch failures. Smoke density tests, often run in cramped, noisy workshops, show that DBDE’s bromines starve fires of oxygen and suppress flames, keeping burning plastics safer for occupants and workers.
On technical sheets, Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 typically boasts a 90% content of decabromodiphenyl ethane, a carrier resin of polyethylene, grain size around 2-4 mm, and low moisture under 0.2%. These details matter most if you’ve ever dealt with jammed feeders or clumpy powders—consistent specs cut downtime. Storage recommendations emphasize cool, dry places, and the label lays out hazard pictograms reminding handlers to avoid eating, drinking, or smoking near the material. Transporters slap UN numbers and advise separating from acids and alkalis. Most bulk buyers memorize the product code to distinguish it from similar brominated masterbatches—they know from sweaty warehouse days that a simple mislabel sets production back by weeks.
Manufacturers blend granulated polyethylene and pulverized DBDE under heat, pushing the mixture through twin-screw extruders. This operation requires careful temperature controls, since high DBDE loads increase melt viscosity, raising the risk of scorching or incomplete dispersion. Plants add de-dusting systems to keep lines clean, and operators monitor torque, pressure, and color for off-spec deviations. Drying stations and sieves filter out lumps. Years ago, plants struggled with uneven loading, so legacy workers recall the smell of burnt polymer haunting their early product runs. Continuous feedback, both from floor workers and application engineers, slowly fixed these wrinkles in the preparation process.
MB DBDE-PE90 stands up to most manufacturing conditions, but it won’t stay inert under every process. It sits happily in polyolefin matrices, yet high-temperature processing above 250°C can push out volatiles, spawning concerns about degradation and fume management. Research teams at several factories play with compatibilizers and co-additives, trying to tack on anti-drip agents or improving smoke suppression without losing the core flame-retarding performance. Early on, some plants tested alternatives to classic bromination, such as polymer-bound or encapsulated versions, but DBDE-PE90’s reaction pathways remain focused under standard extrusion and molding temperatures, provided operators respect time-temperature dosage charts. Technicians swap notes on stabilizers to hold color or reduce fogging in finished applications, learning from failed runs and slow-cooked test batches.
Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 goes by many names, which can frustrate anyone scanning procurement catalogs. The main active is also called decabromodiphenyl ethane, DBDE, or DBDPE-PE masterbatch. Competitors market nearly identical blends—some call theirs PE-DBDPE 90, others DBDE-PM90. All use different logos and regional trademarks, creating confusion. In Europe and North America, harmonized identifiers help (sometimes called EINECS 284-366-9), but calls to sales reps for clarification never seem to end. Over years in procurement, I watched buyers mistake similar-sounding codes, then rush to amend contracts before misshipments. Industry experience eventually teaches which codes carry the right polymer matrix for particular extrusion lines.
Handling Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 can get tricky for those new to halogenated additives. PPE is a must—gloves, dust masks, goggles—especially in dusty transfer areas and wherever hot pellets spill. Exposure limits for decabromodiphenyl ethane are strict in many countries, even though it behaves friendlier than its infamous cousin, decaBDE. Facilities build ventilation and dust capture systems, run regular workplace air testing, and train staff on spill response and safe disposal. Packaging comes with GHS hazard symbols and long-winded SDS entries. Chemical hygiene goes well past the minimum, as stories of accidental ingestion or skin contact still circulate, often ending in hospital runs or longer clean-up days. It pays to enforce lock-out procedures, proper labeling, and storage away from food and drink to avoid costly mistakes.
Cabling, electrical housings, auto interiors, and construction all rely heavily on DBDE-PE90 for fire safety. Wire harnesses in cars, for example, weave under dashboards and behind insulation panels—out of sight but not out of mind if a short circuit sparks a melt. Builders spec flame-retardant additives in plastic sheeting to guard against fast-moving fires in commercial spaces. Even home electronics, from phone chargers to television casings, list Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 as part of their safety certifications. Manufacturers have shared stories of product recalls tied directly to skimping on flame retardants, which restarted the drive for consistent, traceable supply. What some overlook is the ripple effect: pushing fire safer plastics changes how insurance, regulation, and consumer safety agencies judge whole industries.
Ongoing research focuses on producing cleaner, more stable masterbatch pellets without compromising cost. Testing at polymer labs pits classic DBDE-PE90 against greener alternatives—some based on nitrogen or phosphorus—but time and test after test keep the brominated masterbatch in the running. Scientists chase lower smoke output, less toxic off-gassing, and compatibility with recycled resins. Young engineers entering the field quickly learn that changing one additive often throws off other plastic properties, so companies invest in pilot lines and blown film testers, running small batches for field trials. Data collected from recycling plants and fire brigade reports often end up in long technical meetings, where every tweak gets debated. Fresh grants and increased university collaboration suggest this research surge won’t stop soon.
Toxicologists have eyed brominated flame retardants with growing concern, tracing environmental persistence and bioaccumulation in dust, soil, and even breast milk samples. Decabromodiphenyl ethane, while not classed as a persistent organic pollutant like decaBDE, still faces scrutiny. Wildlife studies point to potential hormone disruption, leading regulators in Europe and North America to update guidelines and push for lower workplace exposures. Most recent reports balance these issues against recorded fire fatalities, noting that deaths often fall sharply in regions with effective flame retardant use. Personal experience talking to both safety advocates and toxicologists teaches an odd lesson: public awareness rises each time media runs stories on new chemical bans or pollution hotspots, and industries catch flak if transparency slips. Most facilities post air monitoring results and train workers more thoroughly than a decade ago, but stubborn gaps in global data persist.
The future for Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 looks a mix of challenge and opportunity. Consumer expectations and regulators keep sharpening focus on health, environment, and recyclability. Alternatives like phosphorus-based retardants, nanomaterial blends, and bio-based systems promise to elbow into the same market—yet decades of test data make buyers risk-averse. Industry isn’t standing still. Investments pour into closed-loop recycling for flame-retarded plastics. Startups shine in pilot projects, hauling in grants to target the elusive zero-toxicity and zero-emission goal. Success probably hinges on scaling greener versions that withstand both regulatory heat and strict fire tests. Sharing technical know-how, opening up safety databases, and collaborating across continents could get new generations of flame retardants into everyday products without hiking costs or cutting corners on public safety.
Most folks never hear about flame retardants until something catches fire or a safety recall shows up on the news. Mflam MB DBDE-PE90, though, works behind the scenes in plastic products. Look around a living room. The TV housing, those black computer cases, and the extension cords keeping everything connected—each of those started as pellets of plastic, and many times, those pellets get a dose of Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 to slow down flames in case something sparks.
Household electronics once went up like tinderboxes during electrical faults. Companies got tired of seeing fire damage reports, and insurance firms didn’t want to keep paying out claims. Research after the 1970s started showing that using flame retardants like decabromodiphenyl ether—DBDE, the backbone of Mflam MB DBDE-PE90—in plastics helped stop fires from getting out of hand. The product goes into the raw polyethylene (PE) before it ever turns into a finished laptop or charging brick.
Manufacturers usually add Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 directly while mixing plastic. No special equipment, no exotic process. Because this flame retardant comes as a masterbatch—a concentrated formula in pellet form—it blends right in with the plastic base. The padding, hard cases, and cable coatings all become more resistant to flames this way.
There's a catch. DBDE-based products, over the years, made regulators nervous. Traces show up in house dust, then in the environment, then in people. Concerns about pollutants in waterways and links with health risks led to pushback. Europe began restricting these chemicals. The US followed with more attention and recommendations instead of full bans.
Plastics recycling adds a twist. Some old equipment gets shredded, re-melted, molded again. Masterbatch flame retardants, once baked into a material, don’t go away quickly. Yet if safety standards for fire protection stick around, companies rely on products like Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 to help electronics pass certification for flame resistance, particularly in places where regulations still allow their use.
A lot of researchers and manufacturers want to find new answers. Some move toward alternative flame retardants with lower environmental impact. Others look at ways to redesign products so they don’t support combustion as easily, even before adding chemicals.
Switching isn’t always simple. Cost matters, and redesigning a phone charger to meet the same tests with new materials takes time. For many plastic processors, using a masterbatch like Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 means they can keep lines running and meet client specs. When factories shift to safer chemicals, they need supply chain tweaks and new safety data to convince buyers and regulators alike.
I've seen factories hesitate to shift away from known flame retardants because customers judge products by price and certification more than the chemicals inside. Education helps—when end buyers push for cleaner flame retardants, change snaps into place faster.
With plastic use on the rise and more electronics weaving their way into daily routines, the search for safer, effective flame retardants deserves steady attention from both industry and the people buying these goods. Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 still handles a job that keeps accidental fires from taking lives and property, but the push for better answers points to a future where safety and sustainability won’t have to clash.
Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 draws a lot of attention in the plastics world, and there’s a reason it has a solid following among professionals looking for flame-retardant solutions. This additive masterbatch revolves around Decabromodiphenyl Ethane (DBDE) as its core active ingredient—a brominated flame retardant that’s carved out its place as a safer substitute for older PBDEs. Polyethylene holds it all together as the carrier resin, which means it slides well into various PE-based processes.
Moving to the baseline properties, you find the DBDE content hanging around 90% by weight. That’s high. It means you get an efficient flame-retardant effect without using much material, which matters when juggling performance and price. Its form comes as easy-flowing granules or pellets, which are simple to handle—no waste, no annoying mess.
A lot of folks worry about moisture, but this masterbatch keeps that in check. Moisture floats under 0.2%, making it great for extrusion or injection molding—no annoying sizzles or unpredictable behavior. The processing window of 160 to 250 degrees Celsius fits well into standard thermoplastic workflows, so you’re not spending money on equipment upgrades.
Safety and regulation keep shifting the ground under plastic manufacturers. Decabromodiphenyl Ethane doesn’t come with the red flags thrown at legacy flame retardants like DecaBDE, which ended up on multiple watch lists for health and the environment. So, using MB DBDE-PE90 helps smooth out compliance with REACH and RoHS for a wide range of products—household electronics, cable sheathings, building materials, automotive parts.
Performance doesn’t slip either. When added at standard loadings, MB DBDE-PE90 pushes plastics over the line for UL 94 V-0 flammability ratings. That means the material won’t keep burning after the ignition source leaves—a real-world difference if you want products that can handle demanding environments.
I know some people feel uneasy about brominated flame retardants no matter how new or “safer” they claim to be. There’s an ongoing discussion about environmental persistence. While DBDE beats its predecessors on toxicity and migration, responsible waste management remains key.
Manufacturers can add compatibilizers or synergists, like antimony trioxide, to boost flame resistance at lower loading rates. This cuts down raw material costs and lessens total bromine content. Keeping an eye on dust control during compounding and testing for any unwanted odor or discoloration at higher processing temperatures pays off too.
A lot of researchers pursue non-halogen options, which might be the next wave for safety-minded brands. Until those reach the same performance at the same price, DBDE-packed masterbatches like MB DBDE-PE90 keep projects ticking along safely and smoothly. It boils down to knowing what’s in your workflow, talking to suppliers about regulatory status, and keeping the waste end tidy. That’s how you keep quality, compliance, and responsibility lined up for manufacturing today.
Living in an age of strict electronics regulation, questions over compliance follow every material. Mflam MB DBDE-PE90, a flame retardant masterbatch, gets a spotlight for one reason: brominated flame retardants, like DBDE itself, trigger concern under the EU's RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) Directive. For anyone who spends time in manufacturing or product sourcing, RoHS rules aren’t some distant paperwork—they’re everyday roadblocks or green lights.
Products labeled with “DBDE” refer to decabromodiphenyl ether. If you’ve ever checked an MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet) or handled compliance documents, DBDE raises red flags. The EU put its foot down on this chemical, placing it among the substances restricted by RoHS. DecaBDE is included in Annex II of RoHS, capping its allowable concentration at 0.1% by weight in homogeneous materials.
Plenty of buyers and engineers want to know if the masterbatch—Mflam MB DBDE-PE90—follows these rules. If it contains more than the legal threshold of DBDE, it fails RoHS. There have been several enforcement cases. The EU doesn’t treat violations lightly; non-compliance pulls products off shelves and puts companies under harsh scrutiny.
I’ve worked with teams that struggled with RoHS headaches. Sourcing a part that drops out of compliance changes timelines, causes irritation, and throws budgets. Non-compliant flame retardants aren’t just a technical problem—they’re a business risk. Many big retailers ask for certificates showing that every part in the final product—down to the additives—meets RoHS rules.
From suppliers to engineers, everyone checks these details. Those who ignore the rules face customs delays, fines, and recalls. In real-world terms, that means loss of revenue, missed deadlines, and sometimes awkward phone calls with clients. Chemical data and certificates become as crucial as datasheets.
Looking at the facts, DBDE has been under the regulatory microscope for years. In 2019, the EU confirmed its place among substances with heavy restrictions. Anyone selling to Europe finds alternatives or faces losing access to that market. Many manufacturers have started moving to halogen-free flame retardants, such as phosphorus-based or mineral fillers. The market feels that pressure everywhere—not just in Europe. Even places without strict laws see more clients asking questions.
In my work, discussions about compliance creep into nearly every project. Decisions lean toward materials with documented RoHS conformity, not just for legal safety, but also out of practical necessity. One misstep can shut down an entire line. Trust between suppliers and customers gets built around clear, current compliance guarantees.
For those handling purchasing or product design, the smartest path runs through upfront communication with suppliers. Ask for third-party testing results or statements of compliance. If a supplier dodges these requests or hands out incomplete paperwork, move on. The time invested in double-checking avoids far bigger headaches later on.
Switching to alternatives makes sense. New flame retardants come without the legal baggage of legacy brominated chemicals. The switch can be costly or complicated, but the effort pays off in peace of mind and added market access. Staying up to date on regulatory lists keeps products and reputations safe. I’ve seen that investing in compliance pays dividends, not just in meeting regulations, but in opening doors to new partnerships and markets.
If you want to avoid problems, check if Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 meets RoHS criteria for chemical content before committing. Don’t trust gut feeling or generic assurances; look for clear paperwork. Regulations keep changing, but companies that make compliance a habit stay ahead of trouble and leave the door open to bigger opportunities.
Mixing flame retardants into polymers often turns into a bit of a juggling act. You want the plastic to pass safety tests, stay easy to process, and not destroy your budget. From time working with plastics compounding, I’ve seen how small decisions on loading rates ripple out across performance, color, texture, and cost. In the case of Mflam MB DBDE-PE90—think of it as a ready-to-use masterbatch based on decabromodiphenyl ethane in polyethylene—picking the right dosage can make or break your end product.
Manufacturers pushing for V-0 or V-2 flame ratings often aim for a loading rate in the ballpark of 10% to 20% by weight. This range lands close to advice from major chemical suppliers and matches what’s used in industry for similar brominated systems. Tweaking inside that window often comes down to which polymer you use—ABS, PP, or HIPS all have their quirks. For some consumer electronics casings, 13% to 15% by weight hits the sweet spot, letting gear pass safety benchmarks without causing headaches in the injection molding machine. Heavy-duty cables or thicker sections sometimes stray higher, chasing maximum flame retardancy.
Cranking up the masterbatch over 20% doesn’t always boost safety. Exceeding this can bring trade-offs that folks rarely talk about. Too much DBDE-PE90 in the mix sometimes leads to irritating white spots, warping during cooling, and even brittle failures after aging. Plus, costs climb faster than fire test results improve. Underdosing, on the other hand, nearly always brings regulatory trouble. Falling short of flame retardancy standards means scrapped batches, recalls, or safety hazards on shelves. It’s not the place to cut corners.
Deciding on an exact percentage shouldn’t happen in a vacuum. Heat stability and flexibility can take a nosedive when you don’t balance flame retardants with other ingredients—like synergists, plasticizers, or anti-drip agents. In a project I worked on with polypropylene housings, it took a week of tweaking not just the Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 level but also adding some antimony trioxide and tweaking mold temperature settings to hit the right feel and function.
Health and safety rules keep shifting. For decades, brominated retardants worked wonders—until fears about environmental and health impacts got louder. Mflam MB DBDE-PE90, a non-PBDE alternative, matches legacy products but needs just as much scrutiny. Reaching full REACH or RoHS compliance means you can’t just guess on dosage. Documentation, batch tracking, and third-party lab testing become part of the workflow, linking specification sheets to real-world testing.
Striking the right balance needs trial and error on real machines, not just formulas on a laptop. I remember a run where even after setting the masterbatch level to the ‘recommended’ range, inconsistent feed led to poor dispersion and failed flammability tests. Only after fixing the feeder and switching screw geometry did the results come through consistently. Reliable advice from material suppliers helps, but nobody understands every processing quirk like the people on the production floor. In practice, keep your starting point in that 10%–20% band and tweak from there, putting each batch through both lab and real-world checks. That’s the way to get true confidence that your plastics stand up to both fire and everyday use.
Every time I walk into a warehouse packed with chemical additives, the real-world habits—good and bad—jump out. Too often, folks downplay the importance of safe chemical storage, but problems creep up fast if containers get stacked in the wrong spot or lids sit loose, especially with something like Mflam MB DBDE-PE90. It’s a flame-retardant masterbatch, and while it offers strong protection in plastics, it demands respect during storage and handling.
The first thing many overlook: temperature swings. I’ve seen bags and drums of certain chemicals turn clumpy or even leak after a few days in hot, humid corners. Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 responds the same way. Safe bets point toward a cool, dry room, away from direct sunlight. If a place gets stuffy or bakes in the afternoon sun, product quality goes downhill quick. Storing it off the floor helps a lot, too, since concrete pulls in moisture, which can react with the material or lead to caking that slows down production lines.
Letting dust, scraps, or spilled resin collect in storage areas doesn’t just look sloppy. It also sucks for safety and can mess with the masterbatch’s long-term performance. Pallets and shelving should stay free of clutter, with access points clear so workers grab what they need without crawling over junk. I’ve watched project deadlines stretch out just because someone mismanaged space or stacked incompatible chemicals together in a rush. Each product needs its lane.
People sometimes transfer masterbatch pellets into random bins or cut holes in bags to speed up scooping. It always feels like a shortcut, but the downside hits down the road. Seals on original packaging keep out moisture and airborne dirt. Labels stick around, so nobody plays guessing games later. Some of the worst mistakes I’ve seen didn’t come from bad product, but from someone rebagging materials and losing track. Keeping Mflam MB DBDE-PE90 in sealed, labeled containers takes almost no time and avoids a whole bunch of headaches.
I once got a minor chemical burn on my arm because of carelessness. Gloves, goggles, and the right workwear don’t win style points, but skipping them pushes luck. The fine dust from these additives irritates skin and eyes. Respiratory masks help too, especially when scooping or pouring. Even if management seems casual, I always nudge coworkers to suit up; a lazy minute leads to a rough week if you ignore safety.
Each drum or bag comes with a safety data sheet. Some places treat those sheets like fancy paper, but they help whenever there’s a spill, fire, or quality question. Posting copies near storage areas lets folks work faster, safer, and with peace of mind. Regular checks—monthly at least—ensure stock rotates, nothing sits past its shelf life, and damage gets caught before it spreads.
Crossed pathways, blocked exits, and tangled hoses turn small accidents into disasters. Emergency showers, eye-washes, and spill kits belong near storage hubs, not hidden in some far corner. It’s easy to talk about “preparedness,” but I learned firsthand that an uncluttered approach helps people respond fast and keeps minor problems from escalating. Even basic mats or raised trays around pallets cut down on slip hazards and clean-up hassles.
Assigning a “storage captain” goes a long way. One person checking logs, watching for leaks, and reporting issues stops confusion before it grows. Training never hurts. Hands-on refreshers once a year or so keep both new hires and veterans alert and invested. Small tweaks—a thermometer on the wall, silica gel packs in bins, a clipboard by the entry—offer layers of protection without fancy expense.
Solid storage and handling build trust up and down the supply chain. Product stays consistent, people stay healthy, and the whole plant runs smoother. That beats firefighting preventable messes every time.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 1,1'-(Methylenebis(oxy))bis[2,3,4,5,6-pentabromobenzene] |
| Other names |
Decabromodiphenyl ethane masterbatch DBDPE masterbatch Decabromodiphenylethane masterbatch Mflam MB DBDPE |
| Pronunciation | /ˈɛm.flæm ˈɛm.bi ˈdiː.biːˈiː piː iː ˈnaɪn.ziː.roʊ/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | **1197191-51-1** |
| 3D model (JSmol) | Sorry, I can't provide the '3D model (JSmol)' string for 'Mflam MB DBDE-PE90'. |
| Beilstein Reference | 4197045 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:83485 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2103837 |
| ChemSpider | 51787360 |
| DrugBank | DB01050 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 100000013106 |
| EC Number | 01-2119456814-38-0002 |
| Gmelin Reference | 26394 |
| KEGG | C18744 |
| MeSH | Copolymers, Flame Retardants, Polyethylenes, Decabromodiphenyl Ether |
| PubChem CID | 122350 |
| RTECS number | PA9646000 |
| UNII | T5I7J1ONR3 |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID90893215 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C14H4Br6O2 |
| Molar mass | 690.28 g/mol |
| Appearance | White powder |
| Odor | Faint Characteristic Odor |
| Density | 1.22 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 4.65 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 13.6 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.8 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | '1.6 x 10^-5 emu/g' |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.58 |
| Viscosity | 3000-8000 mPa.s |
| Dipole moment | 1.42 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 1.10 J/mol·K |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -200.5 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -65.37 kJ/g |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | M01AE01 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS02, GHS07, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: H351 Suspected of causing cancer. |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P264, P272, P273, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P333+P313, P337+P313, P362+P364, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0-NA |
| Flash point | >250°C |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 2000 mg/kg (rat-oral) |
| NIOSH | Not listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | 0.1 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 10000 ppm |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Decabromodiphenyl ether MBDE BDE-209 |
